Received: from shedevil.annepmitchell.com (adsl-64-165-36-235.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.165.36.235]) by ns1.fecyk.ca
 (SMTPRCV 0.31) with SMTP id <B0000002608@ns1.fecyk.ca>;
 Tue, 12 Feb 2002 20:33:02 -0600
Received: from annie ([192.168.0.8])
        by shedevil.annepmitchell.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g1D2Vnx38363
        for <gordonf@fecyk.ca>; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 18:31:53 -0800 (PST)
From: "Anne P. Mitchell, Esq." <anne@mail-abuse.org>
To: gordonf@fecyk.ca
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 18:25:50 -0800
Subject: Question
Message-ID: <3C695E2E.13484.1D3E6B06@localhost>
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)

Gordon,

We have received calls from subscribers saying that they have
"heard through the grapevine" that you have posted something to one
or more lists saying that with your leaving MAPS, the DUL will no
longer be the DUL as they knew it.  As you can imagine, this has made
those subscribers nervous, and may put in jeopardy at least one
pending contract.

Can you please put my mind to rest here, and let me know what  you
actually said, versus what they are perhaps inferring?

Thanks.

Anne P. Mitchell,  Esq.
Director, Legal and Public Affairs
Mail Abuse Prevention System, LLC (MAPS)
http://www.mail-abuse.org